<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email is not Secure&#8230;but it can be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/</link>
	<description>The home and home office computer security center</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Good point! I saw an article in Wall Street Journal that spoke of email that has a finite lifetime - down to 10 minutes - before it self-destructs. And it cannot be copied, edited, etc.
I've heard of companies that will not use email. Period. Pretty drastic.
I believe *eventually* targeted email will be the norm.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point! I saw an article in Wall Street Journal that spoke of email that has a finite lifetime - down to 10 minutes - before it self-destructs. And it cannot be copied, edited, etc.<br />
I&#8217;ve heard of companies that will not use email. Period. Pretty drastic.<br />
I believe *eventually* targeted email will be the norm.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mroonie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>mroonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mysecurepc.com/2006/09/18/email-is-not-securebut-it-can-be/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Yeah, encrypted email is great for businesses.  The only problem with using encryption ONLY is it may protect your email during its travels but it will not protect it once it reaches its destination.  Read this article in the &lt;a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/personaltechnology/2003209737_ptinbo19.html"&gt;Seattle Times&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href="http://www.essentialsecurity.com/product.htm"&gt;Taceo&lt;/a&gt; which is an email anti-theft security software that not only encrypts emails for sending and receiving but it also has features that disallows printing, copying, editing or forwarding of email and email attachments.

This tool would be ideal for business so that they don't suffer anymore losses in IP and company assets.  *cough cough* AOL *cough cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, encrypted email is great for businesses.  The only problem with using encryption ONLY is it may protect your email during its travels but it will not protect it once it reaches its destination.  Read this article in the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/personaltechnology/2003209737_ptinbo19.html">Seattle Times</a> about <a href="http://www.essentialsecurity.com/product.htm">Taceo</a> which is an email anti-theft security software that not only encrypts emails for sending and receiving but it also has features that disallows printing, copying, editing or forwarding of email and email attachments.</p>
<p>This tool would be ideal for business so that they don&#8217;t suffer anymore losses in IP and company assets.  *cough cough* AOL *cough cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
